A. T. Fomenko Chronology 1 Introducing the problem. A criticism of the Scaligerian chronology. Dating methods as offered by mathematical statistics. Eclipses. Newton also was unhappy with the chronology compiled in the seventeen century by Scalliger. Fomenco says point blank that the chronology. Fomenko’s New Chronology asserts that most of recorded history was composed by Church mandate, for the.

Author: Shalrajas Ganris
Country: Solomon Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 25 March 2011
Pages: 433
PDF File Size: 19.56 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.14 Mb
ISBN: 891-7-64041-426-2
Downloads: 42929
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shakajar

For each analysed text, a function is devised which maps each year mentioned in the text with the number of pages lines, letters devoted in the text to its description which could be zero. Among these texts is a series of Babylonian astronomical diarieswhich records precise astronomical observations of the Moon and planets, often dated in terms of the reigns of known historical figures extending back to the 6th century BCE.

Flmenko New Chronology also contains a reconstructionan alternative chronology, radically shorter than the standard historical timeline, because all ancient history is “folded” onto the Middle Ages.

Views Read Edit Fossil record. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. I’ll do a more complete review later as i’m still working through the volumes that have been translated into English.

New Chronology

Revisionist histories –dissenting views within the academic discipline of history–should not be included within this category, chronoloy that they are based upon logical arguments, verifiable data, and are formed by individuals conversant in accepted historiography. Stephenson has demonstrated through a systematic study of a large number of BabylonianAncient and Medieval European, and Chinese records of eclipse observations that they can be dated consistently with conventional chronology at least as far back as BCE.

Furthermore, the mutual consistency of these independent dendrochronological sequences has been confirmed by comparing their radiocarbon and dendrochronological ages. James’ attempt at historical revisionism could be the most seriously argued yet.

This study showed that either the description of the phenomena observed at the solar eclipse or of a set of conjunctions of the slow planets SaturnJupiterand Mars were sufficient to chronopogy S.


The evangelical Jesus is traditionally believed to have lived for 33 years, and he was an adult at the time of his encounter with John the Baptist. Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go.

Fomenko uses mathematics to explain inconsistencies! Beam writes that Fomenko and his colleagues were discovered by the Soviet scientific press in the early s, leading to “a brief period of renown”; a contemporary review from the Soviet journal Questions of History complained, “Their constructions have nothing in common with Marxist historical science.

It is also clear that their chronological shenanigans come in two basic varieties: I am not sure if posting it here is ok, if it doesn’t belong please delete. East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. Russia in Search of Itself. The dates obtained agree with the accepted chronology.

Astronomical retrocalculations for all these moving objects allow us to date these observations, and consequently the rulers’ reigns, to within a single day. Archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact and contradictory, therefore there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century.

Why exactly Fomenko argues all of this and how he attempts to prove these claims is another matter entirely. Explore the Home Gift Guide.

Apart from his creation of the New Chronology, Fomenko is a notable mathematician who has earned his doctorate, taught at Moscow State Lomonosov University, become a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, won a State Prize of the Russian Federation for mathematics, and published some works. Astrophysics and Space Science vol.

Alternate historical chronology

Critics allege that many of the supposed correlations of regnal durations are the product of the selective chronoolgy and blending of the dates, events, and individuals mentioned in the original text. Fomenko picked up these ideas, added in a host of dubious mathematical calculations related to the astronomical record, and so the New Chronology was born.


For example, one of the properties is the way of death: Do you already have an account? Fomenko’s historical ideas have been universally rejected by mainstream scholars, who brand them as pseudoscience[36] but were popularized by former world chess champion Garry Kasparov.

Newton also was unhappy with the chronology compiled in the seventeen century by Scalliger. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all content licensed as indicated by RationalWiki: In Otto Rank made note of duplications in literary history of a variety of cultures:.

Full text of “Anatoly Fomenko Books”

Einstein is quoted, ” During the renaissance forgers often did just that and many such corrupt renderings were exposed. The Issue with Chronology History: Experimental test of the maxima correlation principle”. Fiction or Science vol. Kasparov also felt it illogical that the Romans and the Greeks living under the banner of Byzantium could fail to use the mounds of scientific knowledge left them by Ancient Greece and Rome, especially when it was of urgent military use.

Fomenko revised chronology | Alternate History Discussion

This article relies too much on references to primary sources. James Billingtonformerly professor of Russian history at Harvard and Princeton and the Librarian of Congress from placed Fomenko’s work within the context of the political movement of Eurasianismwhich sought to tie Russian history closely to that of its Asian neighbors. The majority of scientific commentators consider The New Chronology to be pseudoscientific.

Modern history wants us to believe that there was a circular route from the east meds to Rome, then back to the eastern meds through the split of the Roman Empire and the emergence of the Byzantine Empire, and then back again to Rome, where Renaissance sprung up and the modern era begun.

However this is not the case.

Author: admin